------------------------------ Cut here ------------------------------
>From SElli97635@aol.com Sat Apr 27 11:57:28 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA11712 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id LAA17745 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 11:57:25 -0700
Received: from ics.uci.edu(128.195.1.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma017743; Sat Apr 27 11:57:15 1996
Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id aa27800;
27 Apr 96 11:57 PDT
Received: by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA06403; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 14:13:22 -0400
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15393 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id MAA16616 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:14:07 -0700
Received: from ics.uci.edu(128.195.1.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma016498; Mon Apr 29 12:13:39 1996
Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id aa21652;
29 Apr 96 12:13 PDT
Received: by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA15344; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 13:37:50 -0400
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA22631 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id VAA12385 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 21:22:14 -0700
Received: from mail.netcom.com(192.100.81.99) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma012379; Mon Apr 29 21:22:05 1996
Received: from teknolej.ix.netcom.com (ix-jc7-03.ix.netcom.com [204.32.175.35]) by mail (8.6.13/Netcom)
id VAA09112; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 21:21:18 -0700
Message-ID: <31859503.4BCE@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:20:19 -0400
From: David Youssef <teknolej@ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: think-c@rdatasys.com
Subject: NEED SOME QUICK CASH?? READ THIS AND TRY IT!!!!!
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA02190 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id OAA23890 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:05:58 -0700
Received: from ics.uci.edu(128.195.1.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma023821; Tue Apr 30 14:04:47 1996
Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id aa17313;
30 Apr 96 14:03 PDT
Received: by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA18294; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 15:31:10 -0400
1. 19-Part email- can be read by EVERYONE (~525 K Total).
2. For more advanced computer users: attached text file ~525K - you
must know how to download an attached text file and then be able to
open it with your word processor. If in doubt, don't ask for this
version. This isn't for internet *newbies.* Better to order option 1
and spend a few minutes pasting them into one whole text document
with your word processor, than to waste hours trying to figure how
to deal with this option.
3. For more advanced Macintosh computer users: compressed attached
text file, created with a Stuffit(tm) self-extracting archive (.sea),
~133K. Can be decompressed by any Macintosh computer user; no
special expansion software or knowledge of Stuffit (tm) needed. You
just double-click on the file icon and it automatically expands
(unstuffs). This is for more advanced mac computer users only, as
you still have to know how to deal with an attached file. It will cut
your download time by 75%. Expands out to the same ~525K file in
option #2. See option #2 for more info on what you will need to be
able to do.
4. For expert computer users: compressed attached text file, created with
Stuffit(tm), ~114K. Can be decompressed by any computer user who
has expansion software to decompress (expand) Stuffit(tm) (.sit) files.
This is for more advanced computer users only and will cut your
download time by 78%. Expands out to the same ~525K file in option
#2. See option #2 for more info on what you will need to be able to do.
Hi fellow 'netters,
My name is Stuart Mallory and I recently started using a magazine
subscription club in the USA that has a FREE 1 yr. magazine subscription deal
with your first paid order- and I have been very pleased with them. They
have over 1,500 different USA titles that they can ship to any country on a
subscription basis. As for computer magazines from the USA, they more of a
selection than I ever knew even existed. They have magazines for most every
area of interest in their list of 1,500 titles.
Within the USA, for their USA members, they are cheaper than all their
competitors and even the publishers themselves. This is their price
guarantee.
Overseas, on the average, they are generally around one-fourth to one-half of
what the newsstands overseas charge locally for USA magazines. On some
titles they are as little as one-tenth of what the newsstands charge. They
feel that mgazines should not be a luxury overseas. In the USA, people buy
magazines and then toss them after reading them for just a few minutes or
hours. They are so cheap in the USA! Well, this company would like to make
it the same way for their overseas members. They are also cheaper than all
their competitors in the USA and overseas, including the publishers
themselves! This is their price guarantee. Around one-half their business
comes from overseas, so they are very patient with new members who only speak
limited English as a 2nd language.
Their prices are so cheap because they deal direct with each publisher and
cut-out all the middlemen.
They will send you their DELUXE EMAIL CATALOGUE (around 525K-big and juicey)
!)...if you completely fill out the form above. It has lists of all the
freebies, lists of all the titles they sell, titles broken down by categories
and detailed descriptions on nearly 1,200 of the titles that they sell.
Please do not email me as I am just a happy customer and a *busy* student. I
don't have time to even complete my thesis in time, let alone run my
part-time software business! Please fill out the above form and carefully
follow the intructions above to get it to them via fax or smail.
They guarantee to beat all their competitors' prices. Sometimes they are less
than half of the next best deal I have been able to find and other times,
just a little cheaper - but I have never found a lower rate yet. They
assured me that if I ever do, they will beat it.
They have been very helpful and helped me with all my address changes as I
haved moved from one country to another.
They have a deal where you can get a free 1 yr. sub to a new magazine from a
special list of over 270 popular titles published in the USA. They will
give you this free 1 yr. sub when you place your first paid order with them
to a renewal or new subscription to any of the over 1,500 different popular
USA titles they sell.
They can arrange delivery to virtually any country and I think they have
clients in around 45 or 46 countries now. Outside the USA there is a charge
for FPH (foreign postage and handling) (on both paid and freebie subs) that
varies from magazine to magazine. I have found their staff to be very
friendly and courteous. They even helped me with an address change when I
moved from one country to another.
The owner thinks of his service as a "club" and his clients as "members"
(even though there is no extra fee to become a member - your first purchase
automatically makes you a member) and he is real picky about who he accepts
as a new member. When he sets you up as a new member, he himself calls you
personally on the phone to explain how he works his deal, or sometimes he has
one of his assistants call. He is kind of quirky sometimes - he insists on
setting up new members by phone so he can say hi to everyone (I sure wouldn't
want to have his phone bills!), but you can place future orders (after your
first order) via E-mail.
He has some really friendly young ladies working for him, who seem to know
just as much as he does about this magazine stuff. If you live overseas, he
will even call you there, as long as you are interested, but I think he still
makes all his overseas calls on the weekends, I guess cause the long distance
rates are cheaper then.
He only likes to take new members from referrals from satisfied existing
members and he does virtually no advertising. When I got set-up, they had a
2-3 week waiting list for new members to be called back so that they could
join up. (Once you are an existing member, they help you immediately when you
call. ) I think they are able to get back to prospective new members the
same day or within a few days now, as they have increased their staff. I am
not sure about this.........but if you email the above form to them, that is
the way to get started!
They will send you their DELUXE EMAIL CATALOGUE (around 525K-big and juicey)
!)...if you completely fill out the form above. It has lists of all the
freebies, lists of all the titles they sell, titles broken down by categories
and detailed descriptions on nearly 1,200 of the titles that they sell.
They then send you email that outlines how his club works and the list of
free choices that you can choose from, as well as the entire list of what he
sells; and then they will give you a quick (3-5 minute) friendly,
no-pressure no-obligation call to explain everything to you personally and
answer all your questions.
Once you get in, you'll love them. I do.
Sincerely,
Stuart Mallory
>From nagel@intelenet.net Thu May 2 14:31:33 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA23586 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 2 May 1996 14:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id OAA29206 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 2 May 1996 14:31:31 -0700
Received: from nikita.intelenet.com(204.182.160.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma029196; Thu May 2 14:31:00 1996
Received: from intelenet.net (boris.intelenet.net [206.82.218.11]) by ns.intelenet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA18415 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 2 May 1996 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: think-c@rdatasys.com
Subject: ADMIN: spam this!
Reply-To: nagel@intelenet.net
X-Organization: InteleNet Communications
X-URL: http://www.intelenet.net
X-Phone: (714) 851-8250
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 14:37:24 PDT
Message-ID: <29673.831073044@intelenet.net>
From: "Mark D. Nagel" <nagel@intelenet.net>
OK, I had to go ahead and make this list private. What that means is
that you may only submit messages from the address with which you are
subscribed. If you have problems with that, please let me know and we
will work on a solution. Common causes of problems with this new
mechanism include:
* you've moved to a new e-mail address and your old address is
still forwarding.
* your organization has changed to a new domain layout since
you subscribed.
* any other change in your situation that would lead to your
'From:' address appearing different from the one with which
you first subscribed.
If there are _too_ many problems, I will open the list up again but
make it fully moderated, meaning I get to approve or reject any
message. I would only reject blatant spam in that case.
Mark
>From owen@ids.net Thu May 2 17:44:44 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA06680 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 2 May 1996 17:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id RAA08669 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 2 May 1996 17:44:42 -0700
Received: from ids.net(155.212.1.2) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma008667; Thu May 2 17:44:17 1996
Received: from [155.212.70.119] by 155.212.70.119 with SMTP;
To: nagel@intelenet.net, Multiple recipients of list <think-c@rdatasys.com>
From: owen@ids.net (Owen Hartnett)
Subject: Re: ADMIN: spam this!
At 2:34 PM 5/2/96, Mark D. Nagel wrote:
>OK, I had to go ahead and make this list private.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!!!
-Owen
Obligatory Think-c stuff: Did you know that Symantec has updated Think
Pascal (though ever so little) on the newest SPM release 5?
-O
>From malmgren@euronet.nl Fri May 3 03:33:50 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA12737 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 03:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id DAA00928 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 03:33:45 -0700
Received: from mail.euronet.nl(194.134.0.67) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma000926; Fri May 3 03:33:41 1996
Received: from [194.134.1.149] (p422.asd.euronet.nl [194.134.1.151]) by mail.euronet.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA19424; Fri, 3 May 1996 12:33:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Greg Galanos (president of MW) has personally responded to
a few questions i've asked about incorporating support for
MW's products in our offerings. He has been EXTREMELY helpful
and seems to take our efforts VERY seriously. Example: He is
exploring with his legal department an option to allow
participation in OUR classes to be sufficient to qualify people
for their 'student discount' program. No commitment is in place
at this time for THAT issue, but just the fact that he's exploring
it says something to ME.
I don't KNOW about Symantec's pricing system in this area, and
THAT specific issue may be moot as a comparison point as Symantec
MAY offer their analogous discount (assuming they have one) to
anyone. Discount pricing for students is NOT the issue here, however.
As you know, i've been looking for someone on our team to insure
proper coverage of Symantec's tools in our materials. THAT IS
THE POINT HERE. Since noone from among our current team members
has spoken up, on 04/23, i sent the following to Will Iverson
(the individual who is in charge of Developer Relations for Symantec).
****** begin quote
Will:
<SNIP of unrelated comment>
I'm sending this note to you because i noted your 'title' at the
bottom of the posting. I believe you may see that this is in YOUR
interest every bit as much as it is in 'mine'.
I am the leader of a group of people who have decided to create a
free (and IMPARTIAL) net-based service to assist people that want to
learn how to program for the Mac.
I will be VERY blunt here and say that i am a FORMER user of your
products who switched to CodeWarrior when Symantec's commitment
to the Mac platform was...... questionable. I've seen the effort
that Symantec has put into correcting that issue, and i respect and
salute the quality of what you HAVE done, but since an individual
only NEEDS one dev environment (i know that could be debated, but
i'm also on a strict budget) and i have learned CW and am satisfied
with it i have NOT felt compelled to purchase the attendant upgrades
& relearn the newer aspects of your company's offerings.
However, if you'll check out our web site
http://www.aimed.org/most/
you will see that i am actively seeking to make this site a truly
OBJECTIVE resource for ALL developers, not a place to promote my
current choices or personal preferences in any area. We already
have a LOT of highly skilled volunteers to assist in creating lesson
plans, materials, etc., but so FAR no one who uses YOUR dev environment
has volunteered to assist in this endeavor. Yet we HAVE had someone
who represents the significantly more obscure Future BASIC II commit
to a full level of support. This seems to me to be a disservice to OUR
'users', because i honestly believe that they should have the option to
hear about your products and use them to perform our lessons if that is
their chosen environment.
I have EXPLICITLY stated that i WANT to add support for Symantec's
product line to our course offerings, but will require the VOLUNTEER
expertise of someone who KNOWS them to allow that to occur. This
effort is totally NON-COMMERCIAL in scope and has NO hidden agendas
or axes to grind. If you look over the site and agree that this is
worthwhile you *may* want to provide us with some help in incorporating
info on YOUR products into our site. Even if you only wish to do this
to ensure that your products are given 'equal time' to those of your
competitors that would seem reason enough TO ME for you to at least
CONSIDER this situation. We are NOT looking for free products, money,
or anything else tangible from you, but we won't be able to do YOUR
products justice if no one who currently uses them helps us to do so.
I will be adding a significant amount of new data to the site over
the next few days, but what is there NOW is sufficient for you to
determine if you want to put any time into ensuring that Symantec's
interests are properly represented here.
please advise, and thanks for the time to consider this.
****** end quote
I have recieved NO reply at all from Will. Naturally, it MAY be that
he's on vacation, very busy, etc., but i DO note that the *President*
of MW DID make time to respond directly to my inquiries, but the person
at Symantec who is charged explicitly with Developer Relations has
NOT done so. I BELIEVE that Symantec is trying to recapture the
customers it lost when its continued commitment for support of the
Mac Dev community was perceived as 'weak'. I DO want our *web site* to
remain impartial, but i can't help but draw some PERSONAL conclusions
here :-). I would have thought that Symantec would WANT exposure here,
but what do i know? Things that make you go "Hmmmmmmmm......."
HOWEVER, i don't want to jump to any PERMANENT conclusions here and
recognize that everyone takes vacations, emails get lost, etc, so
i am copying Will on THIS note in case he maybe didn't even receive
the previous email (it didn't bouce back, and it's now been over a week).
Regardless of HOW he may see OUR efforts here, I do still want to
insure that we provide proper support in our classes for individuals
that happen to use the Symantec dev environment. We DON'T need his
direct help to do so, but it would have been nice to have someone
from Symantec on the team. Oh wellllllll...... :-).
Since it APPEARS at this point that Will is not going to respond
to my prev note, is there ANYONE on the team who DOES use the Symantec
environment at all, even if you're NOT a REAL expert on it, and can
step up to being our 'expert' in this area?
radar pangaean | If I am not for myself who will be?
SpectraMediaTech, Inc. | But if I am for myself alone what am I?
radar@SMT-Inc.com | And if not now, when? - Rabbi Hillel
Learn the MacOS FREE - see http://www.aimed.org/most/
----------Email from Radar to Symantec and Metrowerks------------
Note to Radar: think-c mailing list one list for Symantec users
'Ad Hoc'- questions. The whole email you just read was sent to that list
and to you.
Note to think-c list members: Welcome to The MOST!!
Yours sincerely Jens Malmgren,
Layout Director of the MOSTs web site.
Look at: http://www.aimed.org/most/
>From cpgonzal@coewl.cen.uiuc.edu Fri May 3 15:32:17 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA27340 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 15:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id PAA04791 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 15:32:15 -0700
Received: from eehpx11.cen.uiuc.edu(128.174.138.13) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma004789; Fri May 3 15:32:10 1996
Received: (from cpgonzal@localhost) by eehpx11.cen.uiuc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA00943; Fri, 3 May 1996 17:33:20 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 17:33:20 -0500 (CDT)
From: gonzalez carlos perez <cpgonzal@coewl.cen.uiuc.edu>
If I don't own a Power Macintosh do I need to upgrade the Symantic C++ to
version 8.0 ?
carlos
>From rick@devtools.symantec.com Fri May 3 16:53:25 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA02634 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 16:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id QAA08909 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 16:53:23 -0700
Received: from symiserver.symantec.com(155.64.150.25) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma008899; Fri May 3 16:52:54 1996
Received: from devtools.symantec.com by symiserver.symantec.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA24531; Fri, 3 May 96 16:58:07 PDT
Received: from [155.64.182.60] by devtools.symantec.com
with SMTP (Apple Internet Mail Server 1.1); Fri, 3 May 1996 16:51:27 +0000
To: cpgonzal@coewl.cen.uiuc.edu, think-c@rdatasys.com
From: rick@devtools.symantec.com (Rick Hartmann)
Subject: Re: Symantic C++
Carlos,
The current version of Symantec C++ is 8.1 Release 5. It is fat and it generates both 68k and PowerPC code. You can use it now for 68k and later when you get your PowerMac.
Rick Hartmann
Symantec Macintosh Dev Tools Support
send tech support questions to support@devtools.symantec.com
On 5/3/96 you wrote:
>If I don't own a Power Macintosh do I need to upgrade the Symantic C++ to
>version 8.0 ?
>
>carlos
>From wau@satlink.com Fri May 3 20:14:10 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA14846 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 20:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: wau@satlink.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id UAA18472 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Fri, 3 May 1996 20:14:08 -0700
Received: from un1.satlink.com(200.9.212.3) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma018462; Fri May 3 20:13:53 1996
Received: from [200.9.212.94] (ppp-74.satlink.com [200.9.212.94]) by un1.satlink.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA06869 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 00:15:47 -0400
returns in temp a negative value? Do I need to typecast?
Thanks very much.
Fernando
______________
wau@satlink.com
______________
>From m-16012@mailbox.swipnet.se Sat May 4 02:21:53 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA06004 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 02:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id CAA01202 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 02:21:47 -0700
Received: from mailbox.swip.net(193.12.122.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma001200; Sat May 4 02:21:26 1996
Received: from [130.244.104.43] (dialup112-1-1.swipnet.se [130.244.112.1])
>returns in temp a negative value? Do I need to typecast?
>...
Hi Fernando.
Expressions that evaluate to false in have the value 0 (zero), expressions
that evaluate to true can be any value but not 0 (zero). So in your case,
gBufferPtr[i]==60, if it evaluates to -1, then all you can say is that the
expression evaluates to true.
You can not expect an other compiler to generate -1 for a true value it
may be any value that the compiler designer has designed it to be, but you
can always be sure that false is 0.
kaj.
>From wau@satlink.com Sat May 4 12:56:30 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA12945 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 12:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: wau@satlink.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id MAA02880 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 12:56:28 -0700
Received: from un1.satlink.com(200.9.212.3) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma002870; Sat May 4 12:55:59 1996
Received: from [200.9.212.77] (ppp-53.satlink.com [200.9.212.77]) by un1.satlink.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA00486 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sat, 4 May 1996 16:58:08 -0400
>>returns in temp a negative value? Do I need to typecast?
>>...
>
>Hi Fernando.
>
>Expressions that evaluate to false in have the value 0 (zero), expressions
>that evaluate to true can be any value but not 0 (zero). So in your case,
>gBufferPtr[i]==60, if it evaluates to -1, then all you can say is that the
>expression evaluates to true.
> You can not expect an other compiler to generate -1 for a true value it
>may be any value that the compiler designer has designed it to be, but you
>can always be sure that false is 0.
>
>kaj.
Sorry."Mea culpa". The problem thar I got is the following.
I have a buffer pointer gBufferPtr, that I obteined from an ASCII file by
the order FSRead. I need to check
if (gBufferPtr[i]==60)
....;
but debugging I see that the value of gBufferPtr[i] is negative. How can
explain that?. Do I need to cast that value to an unsigned short/int? How
can I do that?.
I can ask
if (gBufferPtr[i]==-96)
....;
and the problem is out. But I have to make a table of each value. I dont
want to do that shit.
Thanks very much. I know my english and my question is primitive, but I am
studying both alone.
______________
wau@satlink.com
______________
>From wau@satlink.com Sun May 5 19:05:18 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA26045 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sun, 5 May 1996 19:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: wau@satlink.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id TAA14274 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sun, 5 May 1996 19:05:16 -0700
Received: from un1.satlink.com(200.9.212.3) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma014215; Sun May 5 19:05:13 1996
Received: from [200.9.212.73] (ppp-49.satlink.com [200.9.212.73]) by un1.satlink.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA21186 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Sun, 5 May 1996 23:07:20 -0400
I only cast with (unsigned char) and everything was ok.
Thanks to all the answers.
Fernando.
PD. Where are all of you? Can you see me..?
______________
wau@satlink.com
______________
>From st95jocl@nts.mh.se Tue May 14 16:56:18 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA00393 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 14 May 1996 16:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id QAA13515 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 14 May 1996 16:56:15 -0700
Received: from midgard.nts.mh.se(193.10.106.6) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma013481; Tue May 14 16:56:01 1996
Received: from dione (st95jocl@dione.nts.mh.se [193.10.106.87]) by midgard.nts.mh.se (8.6.10/8.1) with SMTP id BAA28223; Wed, 15 May 1996 01:55:04 +0200
>From Jareth001@aol.com Thu May 16 07:25:44 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA05564 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 16 May 1996 07:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jareth001@aol.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id HAA26611 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 16 May 1996 07:25:42 -0700
Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma026609; Thu May 16 07:25:40 1996
Received: by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA21601 for think-c@rdatasys.com; Thu, 16 May 1996 10:25:33 -0400
>From slb2@axe.humboldt.edu Thu May 16 14:09:20 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA29363 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 16 May 1996 14:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id OAA11369 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Thu, 16 May 1996 14:09:18 -0700
Received: from axe.humboldt.edu(137.150.148.10) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma011367; Thu May 16 14:09:09 1996
Received: from axe.humboldt.edu by axe.humboldt.edu (PMDF V5.0-6 #11939)
id <0DRIO370100D9T@axe.humboldt.edu>; Thu, 16 May 1996 14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 14:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Summer Bundy <slb2@axe.humboldt.edu>
Subject: Re: How do I write trap patch the right way?
You should not patch GNE, you should patch the low memory global variable
jGNE, which is the GetNextEvent filter. GNE calls jGNE with every event
before it processes them itself, and the filter can override standard GNE
behavior by returning non-zero
the protype is something like
pascal short MyGNEFilter( EventRecord *event );
but you should look it up to be sure -- its all documented somewhere but
I forget where, apple is a good place to look.
Eric
>From Lorenzo_Thurman@tetrapak.com Mon May 20 07:28:11 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA03950 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 20 May 1996 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id HAA27378 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Mon, 20 May 1996 07:28:08 -0700
Received: from guardian.holonet.net(198.207.169.11) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma027322; Mon May 20 07:27:44 1996
Received: from tetrapak (root@localhost) by holonet.net with UUCP
I have writing a CTB program in Think C and been having a very difficult time
getting the scroll bars to work. Can anyone point me to some sample code or tips
that can help?
>From thatsu@leland.stanford.edu Tue May 28 13:08:43 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA07008 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 28 May 1996 13:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id NAA09837 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 28 May 1996 13:08:41 -0700
Received: from popserver.stanford.edu(36.21.0.129) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma009834; Tue May 28 13:08:39 1996
Received: from [171.65.88.135] (S069-Quadra610.Stanford.EDU [171.65.88.135]) by popserver.Stanford.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA09916 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Tue, 28 May 1996 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
I have a problem running a Think C 7.0 compiled application on a PB 540.
This app runs well on a Quadra 610 under Sys 7.1, but bombs on a PB 540
under 7.5.1.
The 68020 and coprocessor options are turned OFF. The applications starts
up and then complains about illegal instruction or something else.
Any ideas?
Thanks. Thomas
thatsu@leland.stanford.edu
Thomas Hartmann
thatsu@leland.stanford.edu
>From craig@epic.co.uk Wed May 29 01:52:17 PDT 1996
Received: from lionfish.rdatasys.com (uucp@lionfish.rdatasys.com [198.232.168.1]) by amberjack.rdatasys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA22045 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Wed, 29 May 1996 01:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by lionfish.rdatasys.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id BAA03257 for <think-c@rdatasys.com>; Wed, 29 May 1996 01:52:09 -0700
Received: from wonderland.epic.co.uk(194.159.80.1) by lionfish.rdatasys.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma003247; Wed May 29 01:51:43 1996
Received: from post.epic.co.uk by wonderland.epic.co.uk (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA19990; Wed, 29 May 1996 09:50:35 +0100
Received: from [128.1.4.186] by post.epic.co.uk with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0uOh4T-000DioC; Wed, 29 May 96 09:57 BST
X-Sender: craig@post.epic.co.uk
Message-Id: <v03006f09add061752049@[128.1.4.186]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 09:51:19 +0100
To: THINK C and Symantec C++ Mailing List <think-c@rdatasys.com>,
Macintosh Developers Group <macdtg-talk@bedford.symantec.com>